We are a non-profit organisation and need your donation! More...
Your donation counts!We are a non-profit organisation and need your donation! More... |
Research & Monitoring and Evaluation MethodologiesQuality and Quantity Demand for Vegetables, survey in a Philippine urban settingSubmitted by Guest on Wed, 06/15/2005 - 16:13
Amelia Luz P. Agbayani, Robert J. Holmer, Gerald E. Potutan and Wilfried H. SchnitzlerIn: UA Magazine 5 - Methodologies for UA research, policy development, planning and implementation Two studies were conducted to characterise the demand of private households, vendors and institutional users for fresh vegetables in Cagayan de Oro City, the Philippines. Specifically, these surveys aimed to provide baseline data for decision-makers and farmer-practitioners to further improve the market transparency for vegetables and, thus, contribute to better producer and consumer linkages. ( categories: )
Improving Food and Nutrition Security; homestead gardening in BangladeshSubmitted by Guest on Thu, 06/09/2005 - 15:06
Aminuzzaman Talukder, Saskia de Pee, Abu Taher, Andrew Hall, Regina Moench-Pfanner and Martin W. BloemIn: UA Magazine 5 - Methodologies for UA research, policy development, planning and implementation Different Ways to Monitor urban and peri-urban agriculture in Dar Es Salaam, TanzaniaSubmitted by Guest on Thu, 06/09/2005 - 15:01
Petra Jacobi and Suzan KiangoIn: UA Magazine 5 - Methodologies for UA research, policy development, planning and implementation In Tanzania, urban and peri-urban agriculture is a well-known activity and has reached the level of official acceptance (Jacobi et al. 2000). Systematic monitoring and evaluation as well as channelling generated information and feedback from the field to the relevant levels has supported this acceptance. A balance is sought between "conventional" and "participatory" monitoring. Both "hard data" are necessary, as is a system that allows primary stakeholders to monitor and evaluate their activities using different methods and their own indicators. Truly appropriate monitoring and evaluation should enhance internal learning and provide evidence to support qualitative statements about the impact of an action. This information can be relevant to members of the community and to decision-makers. ( categories: )
TOPIC PAPER 5: Monitoring and EvaluationSubmitted by Guest on Thu, 06/09/2005 - 14:57
Dindo Campilan, Pay Drechsel and Daniel JöckerIn: UA Magazine 5 - Methodologies for UA research, policy development, planning and implementation The terms Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) are often used in a broader sense than what is known from project work. Half of the resource papers for the workshop presented 'M&E experiences' that consisted of surveys and analyses of biophysical, socio-economic or institutional urban agricultural issues without specific reference to any project or policy intervention. In the strict sense, this kind of "M&E" would be better classified as Situation Analysis and Diagnosis (see the NRI paper). Nonetheless, this topic paper considers that repeated situation analyses also contribute to project M&E. While there is already a well-established body of general literature on M&E in agricultural research and development (R&D), most of the reported experiences are based on the rural setting. Here differences and appropriate methodsare discussed. ( categories: )
GCGF theme 2 - Urban Agriculture and Sustainable CitiesSubmitted by Guest on Wed, 04/06/2005 - 13:19
Research & Monitoring and Evaluation Methodologies |