E-conference: Appropriate methods for urban agriculture (2002)

Appropriate methods for urban agriculture. Research, policy development, planning, implementation and evaluation. (E-conference - February 4-16 2002)

This conference is brought to you by CIP-SIUPA and ETC-RUAF.

Use Altavista to translate these pages.

 

Aims and agenda

Appropriate methods for urban agriculture. Research, policy development, planning, implementation and evaluation. (E-conference - February 4-16 2002)

Background

Urban Agriculture (UA, includes intra- and peri-urban agriculture) is an ancient practice but a recent focus of attention for a wide range of professionals associated with urban management, urban planning and agriculture. In the past these fields have been quite separate, and have elaborated their own approaches and methods associated with policy development, planning, research and monitoring and evaluation. We believe that to strengthen and develop agriculture in the urban environment, there is a pressing need not only to explore the adaptation of the wide range of methods used in rural agricultural research and development, but also to provide an innovative integration of these procedures with the specifically urban methods applied to understanding planning and policy issues.

These considerations have led us to identify six thematic areas through which to identify and debate appropriate methods for urban and peri-urban agriculture. These themes are explained below.

As part of a step-wise process of elaborating a set of integrated methods in these areas, over the past few months coordinators for each of these topics pulled together and synthesized current methodological experiences. During a recently held expert consultation workshop in Nairobi, these syntheses papers and the case studies were discussed and debated leading to revised synthesis papers. These papers are provided as starting points for this electronic conference.

Through the pooling, reviewing and systematizing of these experiences it should be possible to develop an enriched body of methods which urban and agricultural professionals can use to strengthen urban agriculture in their cities.

Objective

To bring together, exchange and discuss experiences gained with a variety of methodologies applied in urban agriculture research, policy development, spatial urban planning, project planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation

Participants

The conference is a platform to facilitate exchanges and discussion between:

  • Researchers (universities, research centres, thematic networks)
  • Urban planners, representatives of municipal departments and policy advisors
  • Senior staff of NGO's, international and local projects, and other persons that have gained experience with the application of methodologies of relevance for this conference

Thematic areas

The conference organisers identified six thematic areas through which to identify and debate appropriate methods for urban agriculture. See Discussion Papers for a synthesis and discussion paper on each of these themes.

These themes are:

  • TOPIC 1: Methods for situation analysis/diagnosis and baseline studies on UA
    The theme will consider (especially participatory/innovative) methods that can be used to analyse the characteristics of local UA systems, their productivity and the technologies applied, the type of producers and clients of each UA system and their needs/priorities, backward and forward linkages, use of soil, water and other resources, environmental and health impacts experienced, etc.
  • TOPIC 2: Methods for participatory UA policy formulation and planning
    This theme will concentrate on methods that are suited for a participatory and ‘early implementation’ approach to policy formulation and planning, like stakeholder analysis, building of platforms for exchange of knowledge, negotiation and joint planning of priority action plans, participatory budgeting, mechanisms for intersectoral cooperation and concerted action, forms of public-private partnerships among others.
  • TOPIC 3: Methods for Integration of UA in urban land use planning
    This theme reviews the methods that facilitate the integration of UA in the process of land use planning: the use of G.I.S-sytems, the integration of urban agriculture in zonification plans and other methods for land and water allocation.
  • TOPIC 4: Methodology for participatory technology development in UA
    This theme focuses on participatory methods for technology development and diffusion in UA, including use of multiple sources of knowledge in the identification and screening of promising technologies, the participatory testing and adaptation of the most promising technologies under local urban farming conditions, use of adult education techniques in technology evaluation, and participatory diffusion of the results of the local experimentation.
  • TOPIC 5: Methodology for monitoring and evaluation of the impacts of UA
    This theme focuses on appropriate methods to monitor and evaluate the impacts of UA on respectively food security and nutrition, health, income, employment and urban ecology. There is an emphasis on methods which are process oriented, participatory and concerned with joint learning, negotiation and consensual decision-making.
  • TOPIC 6:Methodology for marketing assessments and micro-enterprise development related to UA
    Methods discussed in this theme relate to the analysis of consumers demands (food and non-food products), analysis of marketing channels and flows, assessment of linkages of UA enterprises to sources of credit, technical advice, labour, marketing information and other services; analysis of strengths and weaknesses of existing micro and small enterprises involved in input supply, production, processing and marketing of food and non-food products and methods to increase their efficiency and improve the safety and quality of the products offered.

Discussion papers

Appropriate methods for urban agriculture. Research, policy development, planning, implementation and evaluation. (E-conference - February 4-16 2002)

As part of a step-wise process of elaborating a set of integrated methods in these areas, over the past few months coordinators for each of these topics pulled together and synthesized current methodological experiences. The individual experiences and case studies on which the synthesis papers are base are published in the section Background Papers.

During a recently held expert consultation workshop in Nairobi, the syntheses papers and the case studies were discussed and debated, leading to revised synthesis papers. These papers are provided as starting points for this electronic conference.

The following papers are available:

Topic 1: Methodologies for Situation Analysis in Urban Agriculture
Download paper
By Adrienne Martin, Sabine Guendel and Nicoliene Oudwater
Livelihoods and Institutions Group, Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich. United Kingdom

The paper considers methods that can be used to analyse the existence and characteristics of different UA systems, their productivity and the technologies applied, the type of producers and clients of each UA system and their needs/priorities, market channels, backward and forward linkages and external services, use of soil/water/waste resources, negative environmental and health impacts experienced, etc.

Topic 2: Appropriate Methodologies for Development of a Facilitating Framework for Planning and Policy in Urban Agriculture
Download paper
By Marielle Dubbeling
IPES / Urban Management Programme (UMP-LAC/UNCHS-HABITAT), Quito, Ecuador

This paper concentrates on methods that are suited for a participatory and ‘early implementation’ approach to policy formulation and planning It will include: stakeholder analysis, building of platforms for exchange of knowledge, negotiation and joint planning of priority action plans, participatory budgeting, mechanisms for intersectoral cooperation and concerted action; forms of public-private partnerships; flexible, dynamic, interactive planning; institutional aspects (mandates, coordination, budgetary considerations).

Topic 3: Technical Tools for Urban Land Use Planning
Download paper
By Axel Drescher
University of Freiburg, Germany

In spite of ongoing research on urban agriculture, in most of the world’s cities, little is known about the actual extent of urban agriculture in inner city areas. Also, little is known about the spatial distribution of urban agriculture in the cities.
Many questions arise: Where do urban agricultural activities concentrate and why, who is involved, what kinds of crops are grown and by which groups of city dwellers, what is the contribution of the product to nutrition and food security, which kinds of soils are occupied, how is water availability and quality, what is the distance to markets?
An important and so far in many countries unsolved problem are appropriate methodologies to integrate agricultural activities in cities into urban planning processes.

Topic 4: Appropriate methods for technology development in urban agriculture
Download paper
By Safiétou T. Fall1 and Henk de Zeeuw2
1 ISRA, Senegal
2 ETC-RUAF, the Netherlands

This paper focuses on participatory methods for technology development and diffusion in urban agriculture, including use of multiple sources of knowledge in the identification and screening of promising technologies, the development, participatory testing and adaptation of the most promising technologies under local urban farming conditions, use of adult education techniques in technology evaluation, participatory diffusion of the results of the technology development and adaptation process; public-private partnerships in technology development and diffusion in urban agriculture.

Topic 5: Methods for Monitoring and Evaluation and its adaptation to urban and peri-urban agriculture
Download paper
Dindo Campilan1, Pay Drechsel2, and Daniel Jöcker3
1 CIP-UPWARD, Manila, Philippines
2 IWMI Ghana Office, Kumasi, Ghana
3 University of Konstanz, Dept. of Politics and Management, Germany

This paper focuses on frameworks, methods and tools to monitor and evaluate urban agriculture related projects and interventions as well as of the general or specific impacts of urban agriculture on food security and nutrition, health, income, employment and urban ecology. We are looking for case studies of conventional and participatory M&E approaches with emphasis on the adaptation of M&E and its indicators to the specific context and dynamic of urban agriculture.

Topic 6: Methods for Microenterprise Development in Urban Agriculture
Download paper
By Robert J. Holmer
Xavier University College of Agriculture, Cagayan de Oro, Philippines

Methods discussed in this paper relate to the analysis and strengthening of micro-enterprises in urban agriculture and marketing of urban agriculture products. This includes methods for analysis of consumers demands (food and non-food products), marketing channels and flows and their characteristics, assessment of the linkages between micro-enterprises involved in urban agriculture, methods to their access to credit, technical advice, labour, marketing information and other services; Analysis of strengths and weaknesses of existing micro and small enterprises related to urban agriculture and methods to improve actual management practices and efficiency in small scale enterprises involved in input supply, food processing and marketing in order to meet market demands.

AttachmentSize
econf2_discussionpaper_topic1_en.doc223 KB
econf2_discussionpaper_topic2_en.doc402 KB
econf2_discussionpaper_topic3_en.doc52.5 KB
econf2_discussionpaper_topic4_en.doc70.5 KB
econf2_discussionpaper_topic5_en.doc150 KB
econf2_discussionpaper_topic6_en.doc85 KB

Key questions

Appropriate methods for urban agriculture. Research, policy development, planning, implementation and evaluation. (E-conference - February 4-16 2002)

Focus

During the conference we will:

  • Concentrate on methods and tools ("how to" issues), rather than on subject matter, whether agricultural technologies or the contents of policies, laws and regulations;
  • Give emphasis to those methods that fill existing gaps and complement or go beyond more conventional "tried and tested" methods, and to those methods that can address the special characteristics of the urban setting and help to identify technical and process gaps;
  • In general this will mean an emphasis on methods that are: participatory, problems based, policy and action oriented, multi-actor and multi-sector, interactive, interdisciplinary & system oriented, gender sensitive;
  • We will welcome experiences gained within the field of UA as well as in related fields (like the Agenda 21 methodology, Healthy Cities approach, innovative urban planning approaches, PLA, PTD, farmer field schools, participatory natural resource management).

Key Questions

We kindly invite you to share your experiences (successes as well as failures!) with the application of the various methodologies of relevance in the field of UA in any of the following categories:

  • Methods for Situation analysis/diagnosis and baseline studies on UPA
  • Methods for Participatory UPA policy formulation and action planning
  • Methods for Integration of UPA in urban land use planning
  • Methods for Participatory technology development in UPA
  • Methods for Marketing assessments and micro-enterprise development related to UPA
  • Methods for Monitoring and evaluation of the impacts of UPA

We are happy to receive your comments on the topic papers, providing examples that support or falsify the experiences discussed in the synthesis papers and/or that throw more light on the gaps identified and the key issues raised at the end of each topic paper

We are especially interested in examples of:

  • How you adapted existing methods for the specific conditions of urban agriculture, or developed new methods well adapted to the urban conditions;
  • How you combined more conventional methods with innovative and participatory methods;
  • The process of implementation of a specific methodology, the pre-conditions required to implement that method successfully and its cost-effectiveness;
  • Methods adapted to suit better the interests of specific direct stakeholders in UA (women, poverty groups, young entrepreneurs, ethnic minorities) in the cities.

Background papers

Appropriate methods for urban agriculture. Research, policy development, planning, implementation and evaluation. (E-conference - February 4-16 2002)

AUTHOR TITLE
FILE SIZE (KB)
Agbayani, A. L., et. al Quality and quantity requirements for vegetables by private households, vendors and institutional users in a Philippine urban setting.
157
Ansaldo,R. Identification and Improvement of Market Linkages between Producers and Institutional Users: A Case Study on Potato Contract Growing in the Philippines
64
Ansay, M. et al
(19/02/02)
L'agriculture urbaine comme contribution a la securite alimentaire et a l'assainissement des villes
33
Download annex
Balachander, S.K.
(7/02/02)
Confessions Of A Participatory Nonequilibrium Human Ecologist ‘A New Synthesis’: An Indian Experience
30
Balachander, S.K. et al
(10/02/02)
Participatory monitoring and evaluation,through indicators -the case study of small peasant-pastoral communities, Ethbarpally village, k6dm4 agroeco subregion, Deccan Plateau, India.
34
Barsky, A. et al
(5/02/02)
Agricultura Periurbana: diagnostico socioambiental del impacto de las actividades del sector primario en el partido de moreno, area metropolitana de Buenos Aires (Argentina).
72
Bastianelli, D. Methods to promote healthier animal production: examples in periurban poultry production around Dakar
60
Batac, J., et. al Performance Measurement within the Municipal Solid Waste/Urban Agriculture Continuum: A Practical Local Governance Methodology.
135
Bona, J.N.
(12/02/02)
A perspective on urban agriculture in the Philippines
55
Bona, J.N.
(16/02/02)
A student-farmer in Baungon: A case of interfacing appropriate, and formal technologies in UA Philippine setting
36
Brown, A. Urban and Peri-urban Commercial Horticulture:
Appraising the Potential
109
Carrión, A. El Plan Estratégico de Inversiones: una estrategia para la planificación y la formulación de políticas. Lectura a partir del proceso desarrollado en Cuenca, Ecuador.
121
Cisse, G. et al
(6/03/02)
Suivi et évaluation des risques sanitaires liés à l'utilisation d'eaux polluöes en agriculture urbaine à Nouakchott (Mauritanie) et à Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso)
80
Cisse, G. et al
(6/03/02)
Analyse sommaire de la situation de l´agriculture urbaine à Nouakchott (Mauritanie) et à Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso)
48
Cisse, I. et al
(10/02/02)
Agriculture urbaine intensive et santé publique : l’utilisation des pesticides et leurs incidences sur la contamination des nappes phréatiques et les risques sur la santé des populations dans la zone des Niayes au Sénégal
791
Due to the large size of this file, you may prefer to download the
Zip version
442
Cittadini, R.
(12/02/02)
Análisis de la sustentabilidad social, económica y productiva de la horticultura orgánica en la cuenca mar y sierra
70
Cornish, G. Assessing water quality and health implications in informal peri-urban irrigation. Case studies from Nairobi and Kumasi
101
Cruz, M. C. La Planificación participativa en la agricultura urbana: Experiencias de trabajo
123
Dasso, A. J. Methodology for Analyzing Interventions in Urban Agriculture in Latin America
139
Dasso, A. J. Metodología para el Diagnóstico de Intervenciones en Agricultura Urbana en América Latina
153
Dávila, J. Guidelines for strategic environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface
243
Davies, M.
(16/02/02)
MINDA yeGUTA "City Fields" - Local Processing Sites - mitigating conflict-induced food shortages through urban food production
67
Davies, M.
(16/02/02)
Schematic Layout for Local Processing Site
16
Diaz-Chavez, R.A. et al
(15/02/02)
A proposed framework for Sustainable development indicators for peri-urban areas. A case study of Mexico city.
252
Diop, J.
(07/02/02)
Main components of the Indigenous Soil and Water Conservation
87
Drechsel, P. et al Technology development for municipal organic waste recycling for urban and peri-urban agriculture - A holistic approach
102
Drechsel, P. et al Assessing human capacity building and the potential of technology adoption via KASA analysis
71
Drescher, A.
(14/02/02)
The German allotment gardens - a model for poverty alleviation and food security in Southern African Cities?
268
Duc Vien, T. The role of aquaculture in pollution-remediation in Tay Lake and Truc Bach Lake of Ha Noi
102
Esquilo-Ignacio, R., et al G.I.S. as a tool for a Participative and Comprehensive Land Planning. A Case Study: Community Resources Management in Central Mindanao (Philippines) .
34
ENDA-Ethiopia
(20/02/02)
Monitoring and Evaluation methods of UPA project in Addis Ababa
20
Fall, A. S. L’approche réseau dans l’agriculture urbaine : Le cas des unités de transformation et leurs liens amont/aval au Sénégal
84
Gabel, S. Methodological Reflections on Using Participatory and Action Oriented Research with Women Farmers in Harare
266
Galindo, A. B. The Political Ecology of Urban Agriculture in Mexico City: An Actor-Oriented Approach to Explore the Links with Urban Planning
120
Garrett, S. et al
(15/02/02)
Growing a Community Food System
Gockowski, J. et al
14/02/02)
African Traditional Leafy Vegetables and the Urban and Peri-Urban Poor
161
Hermilio Navaroo, G.
(07/02/02)
Avances de investigación del proyecto: Necesidades de Investigación en la Agricultura Urbana y Peri-urbana de las Delegaciones Rurales del Distrito Federal (México)
62
Homem de Carvalho, J. C. PROVE: Small Agricultural Production Verticalization Program.
58
Hovorka, A. J. Gender Considerations for Urban Agriculture Research
46
Ishani, Z.
and Davinder, L.
Applications Of Methods And Instruments In Urban Agriculture Research: Experiences From Kenya And Tanzania
127
Annex in PDF
463
Kiango, S.
and Jacobi, P.
Weaving the net... - M&E tools used in Support of Urban Agriculture in Tanzania
768
Ly, El O. Outils participatifs dídentification des prieorites et dánalyse des discours.
63
Madaleno, I. M. et al New Methodologies And Techniques For Urban Agriculture Research In The Developing World: The Chilean Project
44
Mapatano, S. et al
(15/02/02)
Brief Survey on the Question of Urban Agriculture in Bukavu
91
Marshall, F.
and Te Lintelo, D.
A methodology for assessing the social and economic implications of pollution effects on urban and peri-urban agriculture: a case study from India
63
Mbiba, B. Participatory methodologies for policy development in urban agriculture: visualisation and the Harare experience in the early 1990s
47
Mlambo, A. Institutionalizing Urban Agriculture In Dar Es Salaam City Through The EPM Process
87
Moukoko-Ndoumbé, F. Accounting for UPA Real Economic Performance and Environmental Impact at Farm Level Methods - Analytical approach - Pilot applications
90
Moustier, P. Assessing The Socio-Economic Impact Of Urban And Peri-Urban Agricultural Development
133
Mukherjee,M. et al
(8/02/02)
A Comparative Evaluation Of The Socio-Economic Status Of Women Fishers Of Three Villages In Peri-Urban Areas Of Kolkata
58
Nabulo, G.
31/01/02)
A Facilitating Framework for Planning and Policy Development in Urban Agriculture in Kampala City
85
Nell, W. Agricultural Development within the holistic Integrated approach: MUCPP/CHESP as a case study in South Africa.
(Too large to publish online. Please contact the author: nellwt@sci.uovs.ac.za)
Niang, S. Maitrise des risques dans la ré-utilisation des eaux usées en agriculture urbaine
1098
Nianogo, A.J. Méthodologie de la recherche sur la production animale en zone urbaine et péri-urbaine
85
Nugent, R. A.Using economic analysis to measure the sustainability of urban and peri-urban agriculture: A comparison of cost-benefit and contingent valuation analyses
74
Nyumbaiza, T. A.
(5/02/02)
Entre Deux Saisons Culturales
51
Paje, B. G. Methodologies To Improve Entrepreneurial Skills Of Urban Agriculture Entrepreneurs
81
Pantuliano, S.
and Plastow, J.
Experimenting With PIM: The Acord Sudan Urban-Rural Linkages Programme Experience Of Adapting Participatory Impact Monitoring
354
Patino, F.
and Cordeiro, F
Matriz para elaboracion de documentos lineamientos politicas
53
Perez Vazquez, A.
(8/02/02)
La investigación en Agricultura Urbana; Breves comentarios
35
Prasad, D. et al
(10/02/02)
Farmer participatory approach to technology development and transfer of technology - Control of taro (colocaseae esculenta L) leaf blight (Phytophthora colocaseae) in Samoa
74
Quansah, C. Methods To Identify The Priorities For Technology Development: A Case Study In The Use Of Local Knowledge
111
Sanchéz Avila, H.
(15/02/02)
La práctica de la agricultura periurbana en morelos, méxico
27
Santandreu, A. El Diagnóstico Visual Rápido: una metodología rápida, barata y participativa de diagnóstico en Agricultura Urbana
464
Seck, M. Appropriate methods for technology development in composting and waste re-use in UPA [PDF]
64
Slater, R Urban agriculture in Cape Town, South Africa: A social development approach
22
Spiaggi, E.,
Biasatti, R.,
Guillén, M.
Urban Agriculture and local sustainable development: evaluation and monitoring tools
44
Talukder, A. et. al Improving food and nutrition security through homestead gardening in rural, urban and peri-urban areas in Bangladesh
185
Torres-Lima, P. Sustainable urban agriculture development in Mexico. A methodological approach
57
Van de Fliert, E. Introducing Integrated Pest Management In Rice In Indonesia: A Pioneering Attempt To Facilitate Large Scale Change
95
Vazquez, A. P. Agricultura En La Ciudad Versus Agricultura Urbana; Enfoques Aplicados
35
Vazquez, A. P.
and Anderson, S.
A Methodological Review of Research into urban Agriculture
134
Vladimir Arana, A.
(15/02/02)
Institutional building for the land use management in Peru: the case of Lima
225
Wheatley, C. Fostering innovation in urban and peri-urban based clusters of small-scale agrifood enterprises
62
Zeeuw, de, H. Trying out PTD with NGOs in Peru and Bolivia
75
AttachmentSize
econf2_backgroundpaper_agbayani.doc157 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_ansaldo.doc63.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_ansay.doc33 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_ansay_annex.doc29 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_balachander.doc30 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_balachander_et_al.doc34 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_barsky.doc72 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_bastianeli.doc60 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_batac.doc135 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_bona.doc54.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_bona_2.doc35.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_brown.doc109 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_carrion.doc120.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_cisse_et_al.doc791 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_cisse_et_al.zip441.12 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_cisse_et_al_2.doc47.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_cisse_et_al_3.doc79.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_cittadini.doc70 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_cornish.doc101 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_cruz.doc123 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_dasso_en.doc138.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_dasso_sp.doc152.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_davies.doc66.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_davies.pdf15.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_davila.doc243 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_dezeeuw.doc75 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_diaz_chavez_et_al.doc252.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_diop.doc86.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_drechsel.doc101.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_drechsel_gyiele_asantemensah.doc70.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_drescher.doc269.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_enda_ethiopia.doc19.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_gabel.doc266 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_galindo.doc120 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_gockowski_et_al.doc161.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_homendecarvalho.doc57.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_hovorka.doc44.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_ignacio.doc33.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_ishani_lamba.doc127 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_ishani_lamba_annex.pdf462.14 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_jacobi_kiango.doc768 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_lintelo_marshall.doc62.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_ly.doc62.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_madaleno.doc44 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_mapatano_et_al.doc91 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_mbiba.doc46.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_mlambo.doc87 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_moukokndoumbe.doc89.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_moustier.doc132.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_mukherjee_et_al.doc58 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_nabulo.doc84.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_navarro.doc62 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_nianogo.doc85 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_nugent.doc73.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_nyumbaiza.doc50.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_paje.doc81 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_patino.doc52.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_perez_vazquez.doc35 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_plastow_pantuliano.doc353.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_prasad_et_al.doc50 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_quansah.doc111 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_salam_fall.doc84 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_sanchez.doc26.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_santandreu.doc464 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_seydou_niang.doc1.07 MB
econf2_backgroundpaper_slater.doc21.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_spiaggi_biassatti_guillen.doc44 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_talukder.doc184.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_torres.doc56.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_tran_duc_vien.doc102 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_vandefliert.doc94.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_vazquez.doc26.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_vazquez_anderson.doc133.5 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_vladimir.doc226 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_wheatley.doc62 KB
econf2_backgroundpaper_seck.pdf63.09 KB

List of Participants

Appropriate methods for urban agriculture. Research, policy development, planning, implementation and evaluation. (E-conference - February 4-16 2002)

List of participants
[155 KB]

AttachmentSize
econf2_participantslist.xls154.5 KB

Summary of Discussions

Appropriate methods for urban agriculture. Research, policy development, planning, implementation and evaluation. (E-conference - February 4-16 2002)

AttachmentSize
econf2_summary_week1_en.doc74.5 KB
econf2_summary_week2_en.doc92 KB

Final Conclusions and Recommendations

Appropriate methods for urban agriculture. Research, policy development, planning, implementation and evaluation. (E-conference - February 4-16 2002)

Document contents

  • Introduction
  • Participatory methods
  • Temporal processes
  • Spatial processes
  • Socio-economic and Political context for Urban Agriculture

Download final conclusions
[38 KB]

AttachmentSize
econf2_conclusions_en.doc37.5 KB